Appeal of Dutch SMP regulation​

Situation

Dutch postal regulator ACM found that PostNL held significant market power (SMP) on the Dutch 24h bulk mail market. To address alleged competition concerns, ACM imposed regulation, which mandated PostNL to open its delivery network to competitors at a cost-based access tariff, undermining PostNL’s business model. PostNL projected that the regulation would have a negative impact on its profitability of approx. 50 million euros per year.​

We assisted PostNL’s appeal through expert reports on market definition, competition concerns, and welfare impact assessment. We found that ACM’s market definition was incorrect, meaning that PostNL did not in fact hold SMP. Furthermore, we discovered that ACM’s alleged competition concerns could be addressed with less intrusive remedies and found that, correcting for mistakes in ACM’s welfare impact assessment, the regulation would lead to a negative welfare impact​.

Outcome

We assisted PostNL in successfully appealing a significant market power (SMP) decision, which imposed cost-based access on Dutch 24h bulk mail markets. The tribunal annulled the SMP decision, citing the fact that ACM’s (the Dutch postal regulator) market definition had been incorrect, as documented in our reports.​

Read more about our Postal & Delivery service below.

People Handing over Post
PostNL sees Copenhagen Economics as one of the European Thought Leaders on postal regulatory economics. We have used the services of Copenhagen Economics several times and this has contributed to regulatory discussions in several postal markets in which PostNL is active. Amongst others, Copenhagen Economics has supported PostNL with work related to the net costs analysis of the Dutch universal service obligation in a satisfactory manner.​
Post NL